|
DISCUSSION GROUPS
We
will have four discussion group topics in this course. The discussions
are not 'at will' but are considered an integral part of your learning.
The selected topics will be posted online with specific instructions
and due date. You will receive a grade for your discussion and responses
to the other students' comments. Please see the discussion
topics for detailed instructions. To enter into the discussion
area you will go to Blackboard.
You
must participate in all four discussion topics. At
the end of the discussion period, you must post your final "Summary"
of the discussion topic on Blackboard. Click on the "Communication"
button and then on the "Discussion Board" and then on "Send
Files" to post all assignments.
Please follow the instructions as given. If you
have any questions, please contact your instructor.
EXAMINATIONS
There will be four exams, each worth 100 points. They will consist of
two parts: objective, multiple choice, and matching; and essay. Possible
essay questions will be provided from each of the units to aid in your
study. A 200 point final exam will be given all objective questions.
You must schedule the final exam to be taken
on the assigned day in either the OC Testing Center or a secure testing
facility. Arrangement must be approved by the instructor.
I
RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE IF YOU HAVE A VALID REASON FOR MISSING
AN EXAM. YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE CHANCE TO TAKE A MAKE-UP FOR AN INVALID
REASON.
MAKE-UP
EXAMS AND QUIZZES
If
you are unable to take a test during the assigned time period, you need
to contact the instructor ASAP. Failure
to do this will result in a loss of a letter grade on the exam.
Otherwise, there are no make-ups.
I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDE IF YOUR REASON FOR MISSING AN
EXAM IS INVALID AND IF I SUSPECT IT IS, YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE CHANCE
TO TAKE A MAKE-UP.
DISCUSSIONS
Four
discussion topics will be posted and mandatory
for all students to participate in as part of the discussion grade.
Each question will be worth up to 50 (fifty) points. Discussion topics
will be posted for a total of two weeks and your responses are due
by the Friday of the second week.
INTERNET
ASSIGNMENTS
Four
Internet assignments will be required. Each will be worth a total of
50 (fifty) points. Two of the mandatory
Internet assignments are listed--one from Unit 1 on Civil Liberties
and one from Unit 2 on Civil Rights. The
other two Internet assignments can be selected from any of the others
assignments listed under web activities.
UNIT
OBJECTIVE SHEETS
Unit
objective sheets are included in the lecture notes. They will
serve both as guide to what the instructor considers important from
the texts, lecture notes, research, and discussions, and what the student
is expected to know at the completion of the unit. They will also serve
as a good study guide for the exams because the exam questions will
be drawn from these objective sheets. Exam questions will
be taken from the items contained in the unit objective sheets.
PROJECTS
Additional
projects (research papers, book reports, etc.) beyond those assigned
are optional. Topics or book must receive instructor
approval. A written description must be submitted by
the seventh week of class ( ). Projects are due one
week before the last scheduled class
A "Project Handout" explaining specific rules to follow
and describing how the project will be graded will be posted on line.
A project does not and cannot be substituted for a test grade. The project
grade will be counted as an additional grade to be averaged in with
all other grades.
GRADING
POLICY
The final
course grade will be determined on a percentage basis:
|
90-100% = 900 points = A |
Exam #1 100 points = 10% of course grade |
|
80-89% = 800 points = B |
Exam #2 100 points = 10% of course grade |
|
70-79% = 700 points = C |
Exam #3 100 points = 10% of course grade |
|
60-69% = 600 points = D |
Exam #4 100 points = 10% of course grade |
|
Below 600 points or 60% = F |
Discussion
Participation = 200 points = 20% of course grade |
| |
Four Internet Assignments = 200 points = 20% of course grade
|
| |
Final 200 points = 20% of course grade |
BONUS
POINTS
Ten points for a current voters card will be given and added to your
total point count before the course grade is averaged.
ACADEMIC
DISHONESTY
Online exams and papers are basically open book. However, I would
prefer that you attempt to complete them without using the text or lecture
notes. Exam taking should be done alone and not a collaborative
effort performed with other students in the class or who have previously
taken the class. Cheating or plagiarism will result in the grade
of 0. Remember, on your essays and papers,
cite your sources and URL sites.
TEXTS
Cummings
and Wise, Democracy Under Pressure, 9th edition
ISBN: 0-15-5-555963-7
| Weeks |
Units |
Readings:
C & W |
Readings:
M & C
|
Discussion
Topics
(All
required)
|
Internet
Assignments
(4
must be completed)
|
Exams
(All
4 are required)
|
|
1-3 |
1.
Civil Liberties |
Chapter
4 & 5, pp. 139-142
|
|
Topic
on Civil Liberties
|
REQUIRED:
#1.civil liberties assignment
|
Test-#1--
Unit1
|
|
4-5 |
2.
Civil Rights |
Chapter 5 |
|
Topic
on Civil Rights
|
REQUIRED:
#2.civil
rights assignment
|
Test-#2--
Unit 2
|
|
6-7 |
3.
Presidency |
Chapter
13
|
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
8-9 |
4.
Congress |
Chapter
12
|
|
|
Optional
|
Test-#3--Units
3 & 4
|
|
10-11 |
5.
Judiciary |
Chapter
15
|
|
Topic
on pros and cons of death penalty
|
Optional
|
|
|
12-13 |
6. Bureaucracy |
Chapter
14
|
|
|
Optional
|
Test-#4--Units
5 & 6
|
|
14 |
7.
Foreign Policy & National Security |
Chapter
16
|
|
Topic
on foreign
policy
|
Optional
|
|
15 |
8.
Government & the Economy & Promoting the General Welfare |
Chapter
16 & 17
|
Chapter
3
pp. 74 - 87 |
|
Optional
|
Final
Exam**--1/2 on Units 7 & 8; 1/2 Comprehensive on Units 1-6
|
SOURCES
FOR NEWS AND INFORMATION ON NATIONAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT
1. National:
CNN AllPolitics.Com
and The
University of Michigan Federal Government Resources and GovSpot.Com
2. State: The
University of Michigan Federal Government Resources and GovSpot.Com
GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS LIST
(For
bonus points on test ONLY.)
| FEDERAL |
| Office |
Name |
Party |
Term
Ends |
| President |
George
W. Bush |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
| Vice
President |
Dick
Cheney |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
|
U.S.
Senate
|
| U.S.
Senator |
Phil
Gramm(TX) |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
|
U.S. Senator |
Kay
Bailey Hutchison(TX) |
R |
Jan.
2007 |
| U.S.
Senate Majority Leader |
Tom
Daschle (SD) |
D |
Jan.
2003 by caucus |
| U.S.
Senate Minority Leader |
Trent
Lott (MS) |
R |
Jan.
2003 by caucus |
| U.S.
House of Representatives |
| U.S.
House Speaker |
Dennis
Hastert (IL) |
R |
Jan.
2003 by caucus |
| U.S.
House Majority Leader |
Dick
Armey (TX) |
R |
Jan.
2003 by caucus |
| U.S.
House Minority Leader |
Richard
Gephardt (MO) |
D |
Jan.
2003 by caucus |
19th
District
(Andrews and part of Ector and Midland counties) |
Larry
Combest |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
23rd
District
(Ward, Winkler, Crane, Reeves, Pecos, Upton,
and parts of Ector and Midland counties) |
Henry
Bonilla |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
21st
District
(Part of Midland county) |
Lamar
Smith |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
|
U.S.
Supreme Court
|
| U.S.
Supreme Court Chief Justice |
William
Rehnquist |
|
Appointed
for life
|
|
STATE
|
| Office |
Name |
Party |
Term
Ends |
| Governor
|
Rick
Perry |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
| Lieutenant
Governor |
Senator
Bill Ratliff |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
| Texas
State Senate |
| State
Senator |
|
|
|
| Dist.
28 -- (Crane, Ward, Winkler, Upton) |
Robert
Duncan |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
| Dist.
31 -- (Ector and Andrews counties) |
Teel
Bivins |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
| Dist.
21 -- (Reeves and Pecos counties) |
Frank
Madla |
D
|
Jan.
2003 |
| Texas
House of Representatives |
| Speaker
|
Pete
Laney |
D
|
Jan.
2003 by House |
| State
Representatives |
|
|
|
| 81st
District -- (Ector County) |
Buddy
West |
R
|
Jan.
2003 |
| 82nd
District -- (Midland County) |
Tom
Craddick |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
| 80th
District -- (Andrews, Winkler, Reeves) |
Gary
Walker |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
| 74th
District -- (Pecos County) |
Pete
Gallego |
D |
Jan.
2003 |
| 73rd
District -- (Ward, Upton, Crane) |
Robert
Turner |
D
|
Jan.
2003 |
| Local |
| Ector
County |
Name |
Party |
Term
Ends |
|
County Judge |
Jerry
Caddel |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
|
County Commissioner Precinct 1 |
Freddie Gardner |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
|
County Commissioner Precinct 2 |
Greg Simmons |
R |
Jan.
2003 |
|
County Commissioner Precinct 3 |
Barbara Graff |
D
|
Jan. 2005 |
|
County Commissioner Precinct 4 |
Wilmer Ray |
D |
Jan.
2003 |
| Sheriff
|
Mark Donaldson |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
|
District Attorney |
John Smith |
R |
Jan.
2005 |
| County
Attorney |
Tracy Worley Bright |
D |
Jan. 2005 |
|
County Treasurer |
Carolyn Sue Bowen |
R
|
Jan.
2003 |
|
County Clerk |
Barbara Bedford |
D |
Jan.
2003 |
| County
Tax Assessor/Collector |
Lea
Taylor |
D
|
Jan.
2005 |
|
City
of Odessa
|
| Mayor
|
Larry
Melton |
-
|
May
2004 |
| City
Council District 1 |
Bill
Cleaver |
-
|
May
2004 |
| City
Council District 2 |
Cathy
Herzog |
-
|
May
2004 |
| City
Council District 3 |
Royce
Bodiford |
-
|
May
2003 |
| City
Council District 4 |
Brandon
Tate |
-
|
May
2003 |
| City
Council District 5 |
Berta
Calzada |
-
|
May
2003 |
| City
Manager |
Richard
Morton |
-
|
Appointed
by Council |
STUDENTS NOT LIVING IN ECTOR COUNTY OR ODESSA:
LEARN YOUR COUNTY AND CITY OFFICIALS.
OPTIONAL
PROJECTS
To
replace the lowest test grade. (EXCEPT Final Exam)
PURPOSE: To encourage personal involvement
in a candidate’s campaign, the election, issue, or interest group
activities.
|
100
points can be used to replace the lowest test grade.
|
| 20
hours of work and written report |
A - 90-100 points. |
| 17
hours of work and written report |
B - 80-89 points. |
| 14
hours of work and written report |
C - 70-79 points. |
| 11
hours of work and written report |
D - 60-69 points. |
OPTION
1: Work in a candidate’s or party’s campaign
and hand in a 2-3 page-typewritten report of the work done, knowledge
learned, and conclusions drawn.
OPTION 2: Work for an interest group
and contribute your time and efforts to their cause and activities
- letter writing, picketing, lobbying, petition drives, etc. (A list
of interest groups - including local ones - are posted outside my
office, DH 209.) Hand in a 2-3 page-typewritten report of the work
done, knowledge learned, and conclusions drawn.
Arrangements
must be made in advance,
with prior instructor approval.
As to which option is chosen and what campaign or interest group is
being worked with and the instructor must be able to verify hours
worked, for whom, and the nature of the work. A letter from the candidate
or the organization you worked for must be mailed to the instruction
for verification.
FORMAT
FOR ALL ASSIGNMENTS--WEB ASSIGNMENTS & DISCUSSION TOPIC SUMMARIES
When
posting an assignment in the Digital Drop Box (or emailing it to me as
an
attachment in Microsoft Word or Word Perfect), please include the
following
information in the body or text of your assignment and use the
following format:
1. Name
2. Last 4 numbers of your soc. sec. number (ex.: #0138)
3. Unit # (ex. 1)
4. Type of Assignment (ex.: web or discussion Summary)
5. Title of Assignment (ex.: ACLU)
6. Date Submitted (ex.: Jan. 17, 2003)
7. Course (ex.: Govt. 2302 Web)
ODESSA
COLLEGE CODE OF STUDENT VIRTUAL COLLEGE EXPECTATIONS
How well you do in college is connected, at least in part, to how
well you can adjust to the various expectations attached to your new
role as a college student. Teachers will judge you by how well or
poorly you conform to their expectations of a successful student.
These guidelines do not represent those of all instructors, but it
pays you to know, in general,
what behaviors define a good student. Obviously, I may have slightly
different expectations that you should ask about if they are not made
clear to you early in the semester. What follows is a general description
of what I expect from my students:
-
Good students behave in ways that enhance the learning experience
for everyone in the class.
-
Good students are engaged in the class, often actively participating
in discussion.
-
They use appropriate language in discussion: no profanity or foul
language.
-
Good students practice personal and academic integrity.
-
They do not cheat on tests or other assignments.
-
They do not plagiarize on assignments: hand in the work of others
as their own.
-
They do not lie or make excuses.
-
They complete assignments, projects, papers, and exams in a timely
manner.
-
Good students respect the dignity and opinions of all people.
-
They do not compromise or demean the dignity of others by taunting,
teasing, insulting, sexually harassing or discriminating.
-
They encourage the equal rights and treatment of all students,
regardless of age, gender, race, religion, ethnic heritage, socioeconomic
status, sexual orientation and/or political ideology.
-
They recognize it is their responsibility to communicate any problems
or concerns to the appropriate Odessa college personnel, such
as instructors, counselors, and coaches. This includes extended
absences, health problems, job conflicts, emergencies, incarcerations,
family problems, and documented learning disabilities.
-
They follow appropriate procedures if they a grievance. After
discussing the problem with the instructor, coach, or counselor
first, they proceed in a hierarchical order as diagramed below,
following the steps outlined in the Student Right to Due Process,
available in full text from the office of the Vice-President for
Student Life.
Grievance
Policy - Chain of Command
Student -> Instructor -> Department Chair -> Division Dean
->
Vice President -> President -> Board of Trustees
|